David Icke’s predictions have unfolded with uncanny precision has left us in awe of his predictive powers. We so want people to listen to what he has to say that we say to our friends “Look at what’s happening now – David Icke predicted this years ago – why don’t you listen to what he is saying.” Then we go on to say – he is predicting this or that and we wait for it to happen so that we can say “I told you so – he was right all along”.
Unfortunately the more he is proved correct the more he would be disappointed in those of us who are ‘awakened’. The reason he is telling us the future is so that we can change it, not so that he can be proved correct. The future is not set in stone, it is up to us to change it, as he repeatedly tells us in his works. He is merely laying out the path that will inexorably unfold if we do nothing. Giving us awareness of what will happen should empower us collectively to prevent it.
We are up against a formidable magical foe, a dragon, but, like St George, we have the power to slay this evil monster. Those in power know the occult secrets of the universe and manipulate them through hidden rituals as well as more modern mind control techniques such as propaganda, hypnosis, electromagnetic fields and chemicals.
One does not have to look far these days to find books on ‘magic’ whether they be in the guise of NLP, the law of attraction, the power of positive thought, etc. Books such as ‘The Secret’ and those by Paul McKenna, or going back to the early 20th Century, Ernest Holmes’s ‘Science of Mind’, describe how each of us creates our own reality through the mental images we form. Magic is based on the principle of ‘as above, so below’ which refers to the power of mind over matter (as well as indicating other correspondences such as indicated by astrology). There is much truth in the Bible saying that ‘we are made in the image of God’. We are co-creators, with ‘God’, of our universe. (The God I am referring to here is far from the false construction perpetuated by the established religions. Here I am talking about a universal power far beyond our comprehension.)
Each of us has a holy inner sanctum where the true image of the future is to be found, one of wisdom and love. Those in power seek to gain entry to this sanctum to corrupt it. It is corrupted by negative images of a dystopian future constantly projected into us by Hollywood and the media. The more we accept these images, albeit unwittingly, the more this seeps into our inner sanctum and the more are our creative powers harnessed towards the ruling elite’s dark plan for humanity.
This is where we need to treat the work of David and others with care. We need to hold the paradox of seeing two truths – one that sees the unfolding of the current plan but another that envisions a true ‘kingdom of God’ of love, harmony, wholeness, wisdom and truth. We need to keep the dystopian image in the outer courts of our mind maintaining the inner purity of the true and wholesome image.
Creative power is a combination of a clear image and emotion. The image defines what we will create, the emotion provides the fuel for the fire. If we hold a dystopian image, fuelled by fear we are falling into the hands of the evil rulers. We must hold a positive image fuelled by love and compassion, and sometimes a righteous anger.
It is not enough to hold the image, we must also speak our word. Words have a power of their own (‘In the beginning was The Word’). We must speak positively and affirmatively. Coming back to the beginning of the article we fail ourselves and those around us when we speak words describing a negative future such as the crash is coming, Brexit is not going to happen, etc. If we are to take control of the future we must think and speak of the future we want to see, the one we are collectively constructing.
I believe that there are sufficient people awakened now that if we hold these positive images and begin to speak, to use the power of our words, to affirm the victory of good over evil we will attract the greatest powers of the universe to act alongside us and we will see the defeat of the dragon. It seems to me that the dragon is in its last terrible death throes, thrashing wildly and desperately. We must hold fast to the victory that is already ours, if we simply claim it.
In my interview on the Richie Allen show I made a comment about the link between satanic mind control programming and the transgender agenda. I just wanted to clarify my views on this.
I would imagine that most of Richie Allen’s audience are familiar with CIA mind-control programmes like MK Ultra which produce beta kitten (and other variants) of sex ‘slaves’ designed to serve the sexual appetites of wealthy and senior people in the establishment. Much of this programming is associated with, or takes place within, satanic rituals. Piecing together odd bits of evidence leads me to believe that there is a new(?) wave of programming that programmes ‘sissy’ sex slaves from boys (ladyboys, if you like). I would be very interested to hear if anyone has more direct evidence of this, e.g. a satanic ritual abuse (SRA) survivor.
I also suggested that behind the transgender agenda is likely to be the satanic element of the ruling establishment, which I believe is very active behind the scenes (and, of course is linked to paedophilia).
Androgyny is an important element of occult philosophy – essentially that each of us has masculine and feminine elements and that the spiritual path involves an ‘alchymical’ marriage between these two components giving birth to a genderless spirit part (in very simplistic terms). So I dont’ think that androgyny is intrinsically evil but like all things spiritual or occult can be used in the pursuit of higher spiritual things or debased into the darker side of the occult. Jung’s ideas are very much of the former and satanism the latter.
I am an avid follower of Richie Allen’s Youtube channel. He is an absolute stand-out journalist and presenter. He interviews an amazing array of people that never get aired on mainstream media. I often find myself questioning the validity of the interviewees and of Richie’s views on things – but I broadly agree with the Allen/Icke worldview.
One area that I do find difficult to stomach is Richie’s views on the transgender topic. Firstly, I can acccept that there is a very dangerous agenda being played out, particularly the introduction of transgender ideas to children. As a psychodynamic counsellor I am convinced that children’s gender identity is somewhat fluid for the first 5 or 6 years of life and very dependent on social interactions, particularly with the parents. I don’t think it is healthy to be confusing children at that age about their own identity. Having said that I can also see the argument that seeks to prevent children being bullied or shamed who do have a gender difference set in genetically or very early life (this can happen as a result of maternal influenes in the first year of life).
My story is plain to see on this blog – it is one of someone who began cross-dressing in childhood and who kept it secret for decades. I have been reading copiously on the topic from all perspectives and still hold a position somewhere between it being a pathology and a valid embedded character trait. It is something I have been struggling with in personal therapy for a few years, caring about my family, trying to resolve this aspect of my personality, not wanting to harm anyone else.
I am frequently hurt by Richie’s comments, not that he should stop saying what he says, but I feel that it is a topic where a ‘ranting’ tone develops and, despite all the qualifications, it comes across as splitting off those of us in this ‘camp’, it just touches a raw nerve for me. Part of this is my inner judge – having been brought up in a Christian home there is still part of me that considers it as deviant or somehow and illness. I feel like I am coming across as a snowflake now – but I suppose what I am saying is that there is a middle voice that is yet to be heard on this topic. One that states the position of someone like me – who is ‘manfully’ struggling with his femininity and feels that this issue is little understood and has been hijacked by a group of militants who are actually stirring up more resentment against people like me because of its imposition of certain beliefs on others and also the deliberate confusion of vulnerable children.
I saw on BBC Breakfast this morning a piece on teching children how to spot fake news. There was an academic saying how important it was for the kids to learn to challenge what they hear, to do their own research, etc. which sounds great. Then they had a child being interviewed about what they had learned. They said that the main thing was to look for the brand and to go for big companies. This immediately raised my hackles so I felt I had to write my own thoughts on media and fake news.
There are many factors to consider with regard to news. Firstly, the media organisation:
- Who owns or controls (e.g. through governance) the media organisation?
- What are the vested interests of the owners/controllers?
- How is the organisation funded?
- Who benefits from the audience believing the overall perspective taken by the organisation?
- What is the route to promotion within the organisation? In other words how do you get to be a news editor, for example? (Does the organisation encourage indpendent journalism or ‘toeing the line’?
- What is the stated aim of the organisation (e.g. to make money, to spread the ‘truth’, to promulgate a religious view, etc.).
Secondly, the news item itself:
- Is it based on evidence and is that evidence sourced or linked to?
- What weight would you put on the credibility of the sources? Note that this answer is always a probability that the information is correct. Even the most reliable source can be wrong. It is also worth giving a source the benefit of the doubt.
- Is the same story being reported elsewhere? It is worth checking that the different reports are not all reposts or re-edits of an original article.
- Does the story invoke a strongly emotional ‘anti’ or ‘pro’ feeling accompanied by a subtle emotional pressure that if you don’t agree with the story then you are stupid, naive, bigoted, prejudiced, evil, selfish, outdated, etc.
- Who benefits from the audience believing the story?
Dangers to be aware of:
- Powerful techniques of persuasion have been developed over many years. They are based on proven psychological principles and are routinely used in sales and marketing as well as propaganda. Edward Bernays, the founder of PR, and Josef Goebells, the Nazi propaganda minister, are historical figures worth investigating – but this science has progressed significantly since then.
- The number of people who believe something is not necessarily and indicator of validity. Huge numbers of people can be wrong, for example, belief that the Earth is flat. Most people go with the flow and do not look into information themselves or are simply not well educated.
- State intelligence organisations influence large media organisations. Obvious examples are the propaganda films and newsreels produced during the second world war by all sides. I think most people would be very happy to believe this of the Russians but there is strong evidence that the CIA continues voertly to influence media organisations (see this article, to which you might want to apply the principles outlined here for its validity https://www.globalresearch.ca/the-cia-and-the-media-50-facts-the-world-needs-to-know/5471956).
- Assuming that what you take to be ‘given’ is true. It is always a good idea to keep an open mind and be prepared to change engrained beliefs.
- Fully accepting or rejecting anything. Black and white thinking blinds you to the truth. It put you into a position where you feel you have to defend your position and leads to self-filtering of information, i.e. you only read something that supports your existing view. Truth and falsehood are never absolute, particularly when it comes to the media. It is a good idea to have an internal ‘probability of truth’ rating for everything you think you know. This will automatically alow you to be open to change that view. This is similar to a civil court case where you hold a baance of probability in your mind based on the available evidence.
- Rejecting an opinion because you don’t want to be like the people who hold that opinion. For example holding an opinion that questions Israel’s actions against Palestinians is painted as anti-semitic and you don’t want to be seen as anti-semitic or questioning man-made climate change is seen as wanting to destroy the planet and people don’t want to be put into that ‘evil’ category so they don’t question man-made climate change.
- Believing something that someone says because you believe other things they say. Everyone makes mistakes and some peole can be right about one thing and wrong about another. This goes for media organisations as well as individuals.
- Rejecting an article or an organisation in its entirety because it contains one or more factual errors. Obviously this will flag up a warning indicator but it does not mean that the whole article is wrong. Indeed the error may be inconsequential and some peope will use this to reject the whole premise of an article.
- Rejecting an article or media organisation because someone else has told you that they are
- Having blind faith in any organisation or person whether it be the BBC, the Church of England, your political party, The Guardian, etc. Trust in your own critical, open-minded, rational judgement.
As I reach the end I think to myself that those who need to know about and practice what I have written are those people who will never look at a post like this and those who do bother to read it already know. Still, at least I feel better for writing it!
I have been very quiet since I joined as it has been a lull for me as I have stopped working away and haven’t had a chance to dress for about a year.
Last Thursday I went away on a residential weekend for my counselling course (I am training to be a psychodynamic counsellor) and I was able to dress for 2 evenings and one whole day with the rest of the class and tutors (all female). It was the most amazing experience. One of my classmates came into my room when I was ready and her jaw nearly hit the floor. She kept saying how amazing I looked and hugging me. She said she wanted to cry (so did I). She then escorted me down to the bar to meet the others and the reaction was similarly positive. I had dinner with them and went to the bar afterwards. I felt so relaxed and ‘me’ as you will all understand.
The following day I decided to spend the whole day en femme, and that was simply amazing as well, just doing normal class stuff as a girl. I even did a role play to try out how it would feel to be a female counsellor which went really well. One of the class reacted badly to seeing me dressed (I think it triggered something from her childhood) but the others were totally positive and supportive. The second evening I put on my red dress and shoes and glammed up a bit more. The first evening I was wearing a smart, but more conservative, dress.
This has completely opened up my view of what I can do as a woman. The fantasies I have of public speaking and doing other things as a woman now seem real prospects.
I spoke to an orgainsation last week who may have some work for me in a place where I can dress! Unbelievably exciting. It seem like an exact match – somewhere where I can really add some value. My fingers are all crossed. Don’t want to count my chickens though…